The story in the Daily Mail contains undated photographs of Bob Dylan, said to be taken recently outside of a synagogue in Los Angeles, California. Fine: Dylan visited a synagogue. Those interested in the subject are aware that Bob makes observances of this kind, and good for him. However, the bulk of the story seems without source or evidence, and is really just a cheap violation of Dylan’s privacy. The story by Hugo Daniel is titled: Bob Dylan’s Blues: Ashen-faced singer’s synagogue trip after death of his soulmate. That’s referring to Suze Rotolo’s death over a month ago. How does the Daily Mail know that he’s visiting the synagogue for that reason on this particular day? They claim no source: they don’t know. It seems to just be a gimmicky hook to sensationalize some surreptitiously snapped photos of Bob.
What’s the matter? Lindsay Lohan and Charlie Sheen not providing enough headlines these days?